The War on Mums

Reading discussion "The War on Mums" - Join this discussion / 6 comment(s)
As if Motherhood isn't hard enough, it seems that the media is keen to report on just how bad things have become by making mothers their latest target.

The Guardian starts off with an article claiming breast isn't best, when it comes to intelligence, at least. Whilst factually 'correct', I would be surprised if any mother admitted breast feeding purely because it is rumoured to increase the IQ of their kids. Rather frustratingly, the article goes on to touch on one of the key factors in breast feeding (education), but only in passing:

"The researchers did find a direct link between the mother's intelligence and the likelihood she would breastfeed, however. An increase of 15 IQ points in the mother's intelligence score more than doubled her chance of breastfeeding - meaning that a mother with an IQ of 115 was more than twice as likely to breastfeed as one with the average IQ of 100."

If there are to be more of the researches into the benefits of breast-feeding, perhaps they should look closely into the effects of informed education and what effect that has on the length of time new mothers are prepared to breast feed for. Given that, "in Britain 76% of women start breastfeeding but only 28% persist until their child is four months", there is clearly room for improvement.

Elsewhere, the BBC report that smoking rates are stubbornly high among teenagers, no pun intended, I'm sure. Not only that, but 'pregnant teenagers smoke to try to reduce the size of their babies, and make delivery less painful.' Which, once again, highlights the need for better education for teenagers around all of these issues.

And finally, Slate posted an article entitled "When Moms Work, Kids Get Fat". Packed with disputable statistics, the article claims that "if a given child watches an extra 30 minutes of fast-food advertisements a week, he or she will get fatter, with an increase in body mass index of about 1 percent." Not only that, but "a mere 10 hours at work raises the chance of childhood obesity by 1.3 percentage points, which is about 10 percent."

We seem to have a strange fascination with mothers these days - they seeminly cannot afford to make any mistakes and yet they are also denied much in the way of education and long-term help from the community. Reply to this

Comments

1. Re: The War on Mums by jane, 827 days ago

   I have to say that as a working mother it's a VERY difficult balance. You feel guilty for working, but need to have time to be you, you can't commit the amount to feel you should to work.... you're tired when you're at home because of work.
   
   And then you're getting all of the mixed messages - nursery is good, nursery is bad, you must do this / do that. Surely what's good for a family varies depending upon your family. I know that if I was at home full time it wouldn't be good for my or our son as I'd be restless, yet I don't like the idea of working full time, predominantly because where we live means a long commute for most jobs, so I'd hardly see him, and that's not right either. Weekends then get taken up doing chores, not having fun and doing things together.
   
   I have to say that there is one thing we are good at so far - no television and very little in terms of videos. I don't believe that children should watch TV from a young age - books allow for so much more creativity. Our son now reads them to himself and makes up stories based on the pictures, and it's wonderful to watch. TV just spoon feeds both the "good" and the bad of the adverts.

   Reply to this comment

2. Re: The War on Mums by jane, 827 days ago

   Oh, on the breast feeding point, there is one fact that no one can deny - it's the cheapest way of feeding your baby. Formula is so pricey (along with the equipment and time) that it seems crazy to bottle feed through choice. I didn't introduce formula until 4 months when I was preparing to return to work - even then it was only one bottle a day as he had expressed milk for the other bottle at nursery.
   
   Yes, breast feeding is more tying, but it's got to be better for the child than filling them with chemicals, the long term effects of which (over generations) really aren't known.

   Reply to this comment

   1. Re: Re: The War on Mums by shinningstar, 824 days ago

      I grew up in the province not in the city. My mother used breast feeding for her babies. I noticed that almost all mothers in our town used breast feeding not only because of poverty but it was a tradition from the elders generation to generation. I learned that mothers milk is the best milk for babies compared to different branded milk in the market. To be practical, not all people in our town can afford to buy branded milk because it's expensive for them. And they also believed the religious way of feeding babies. Did Adan and Eve used bottled milk before? What do you think?

      Reply to this comment

      1. Re: Re: Re: The War on Mums by duncan, 824 days ago

         I think you're abosuletly right - but for a lot of people breast feeding means watching what you eat as it's such a direct connection between what you put in and what baby gets out.

         Reply to this comment

3. Re: The War on Mums by ecosrights, 824 days ago

   Yes, you need to watch what you eat, but not excessively.
   
   Unfortunately, I could have done with watching what I ate more than I did - our son suffered quite badly with ezcema and it wasn't until months after I stopped feeding him that i realised it was all connected with me feeding him - he's allergic to dairy and no one ever suggested that the dairy in my diet could cause the eczema, but looking back, I'm sure that is what happened as it cleared up in line with him going 100% onto soya milk. I've been really disappointed with my self for not realising sooner, but you can't get everything right, and as long as it isn't causing a major problem, it works out OK in the end. He certainly shows no signs of problems now.

   Reply to this comment

4. Re: The War on Mums by ecosrights, 778 days ago

   We've recently read an article that raises the concerns of soya for young boys.... apparently it can have a negative impact on their fertility later in life. How much should we worry about that? There are so many things that we are told we should avoid because of feritility problems or an increased risk of cancer- artificial sweetners being one particular contender - that I'm not sure what to believe.
   
   In countries such as China people have been eating large quantities of soya for thousands of years and they don't have fertility problems en masse... surely something like soya milk is a safer bet than some of the more unknown milks / products that are around if a child is clearly not just intolerant of, but allergic to all forms of dairy.

   Reply to this comment

About ecolocal.co.uk

Ecolocal is free to join - why not register today? Our members can start discussions and comment on all the threads

Help us build the best source for healthy living and local news by submitting your tips, events and links so that we can all learn how to learn how to live a more eco-friendly lifestyle.