As if Motherhood isn't hard enough, it seems that the media is keen to report on just how bad things have become by making mothers their latest target.
The Guardian starts off with an article claiming breast isn't best, when it comes to intelligence, at least. Whilst factually 'correct', I would be surprised if any mother admitted breast feeding purely because it is rumoured to increase the IQ of their kids. Rather frustratingly, the article goes on to touch on one of the key factors in breast feeding (education), but only in passing:
"The researchers did find a direct link between the mother's intelligence and the likelihood she would breastfeed, however. An increase of 15 IQ points in the mother's intelligence score more than doubled her chance of breastfeeding - meaning that a mother with an IQ of 115 was more than twice as likely to breastfeed as one with the average IQ of 100."
If there are to be more of the researches into the benefits of breast-feeding, perhaps they should look closely into the effects of informed education and what effect that has on the length of time new mothers are prepared to breast feed for. Given that, "in Britain 76% of women start breastfeeding but only 28% persist until their child is four months", there is clearly room for improvement.
Elsewhere, the BBC report that smoking rates are stubbornly high among teenagers, no pun intended, I'm sure. Not only that, but 'pregnant teenagers smoke to try to reduce the size of their babies, and make delivery less painful.' Which, once again, highlights the need for better education for teenagers around all of these issues.
And finally, Slate posted an article entitled "When Moms Work, Kids Get Fat". Packed with disputable statistics, the article claims that "if a given child watches an extra 30 minutes of fast-food advertisements a week, he or she will get fatter, with an increase in body mass index of about 1 percent." Not only that, but "a mere 10 hours at work raises the chance of childhood obesity by 1.3 percentage points, which is about 10 percent."
We seem to have a strange fascination with mothers these days - they seeminly cannot afford to make any mistakes and yet they are also denied much in the way of education and long-term help from the community.
Reply to this discussion / Report this discussion
Replying to this comment:
Oh, on the breast feeding point, there is one fact that no one can deny - it's the cheapest way of feeding your baby. Formula is so pricey (along with the equipment and time) that it seems crazy to bottle feed through choice. I didn't introduce formula until 4 months when I was preparing to return to work - even then it was only one bottle a day as he had expressed milk for the other bottle at nursery.
Yes, breast feeding is more tying, but it's got to be better for the child than filling them with chemicals, the long term effects of which (over generations) really aren't known.
Reply to this comment
I grew up in the province not in the city. My mother used breast feeding for her babies. I noticed that almost all mothers in our town used breast feeding not only because of poverty but it was a tradition from the elders generation to generation. I learned that mothers milk is the best milk for babies compared to different branded milk in the market. To be practical, not all people in our town can afford to buy branded milk because it's expensive for them. And they also believed the religious way of feeding babies. Did Adan and Eve used bottled milk before? What do you think?
Reply to this comment
I think you're abosuletly right - but for a lot of people breast feeding means watching what you eat as it's such a direct connection between what you put in and what baby gets out.
Reply to this comment